Evidence Sheet

Thermography Study Sheet

This page is the canonical evidence summary for the currently published TNT Pro Series thermography data. It states what is known, what the protocol appears to have been, and what has not been published so the claims stay grounded.

At a glance

Current site-published internal pilot data shows baseline skin temperature at 92.4°F, an untreated exercise-only reading of 95.1°F after 15 minutes, and a TNT-treated reading of 100.8°F after the same 15-minute exercise block. That corresponds to a +2.7°F change in the untreated comparison area and a +8.4°F change in the treated area.

Published protocol, reduced to the facts on site

Step Published summary
Baseline frame Infrared image taken before the exercise block.
Application Product applied to the treated area before exercise.
Exercise window 15-minute exercise block with an untreated comparison area.
Follow-up frame Infrared image taken after the 15-minute exercise period.

Camera and room-condition details provided for this study

Field Current note
Infrared camera High-resolution biomedical/product-testing thermography commonly uses a FLIR T640-series class camera for skin-surface measurements.
Temperature accuracy The provided note cites a typical accuracy of ±2°C.
Room temperature Standardized protocols typically stabilize the room between 21-23°C.
Relative humidity Standardized protocols typically hold humidity between 40-60% during acclimation and measurement.

These values are included here as provided study notes and benchmark protocol context. Unless the underlying raw study sheet is expanded further, they should be read as methodological guidance for this study rather than a full validated methods appendix.

Labeled thermography heatmap sequence

00:00

Baseline

92.4°F

Pre-exercise infrared frame before product-assisted activity.

15:00

Exercise Only

95.1°F

Untreated comparison area after the 15-minute exercise block.

15:00

TNT Treated

100.8°F

Treated area after the same 15-minute protocol.

Interpretation guardrails

  • These values are published as internal pilot thermography data, not as a peer-reviewed clinical trial.
  • The current study notes point to FLIR T640-series class thermography and controlled-room benchmarking, but a full raw methods appendix is still not published on the site.
  • The data supports a stronger local skin-temperature response in the treated area than in the untreated exercise-only comparison area.
  • The data does not by itself establish body-fat reduction, medical benefit, or guaranteed user outcomes.
  • Because sample size and environmental details are not published, this page intentionally avoids stronger statistical claims.

Related evidence and selection pages

Use this study sheet as the evidence anchor, then return to the broader context pages for product selection and shopper support.